Assignment | Lesson Three | Racism
September 14, 2026 9:58 PM
Part One:
Post and submit a reflection at least 200 words using the following prompts:
- The most segregated hour of the week – as Martin Luther King first noted 60 years ago – continues to be Sundays during church service. Why? What does this say about the church? It’s faithfulness to the Gospel? Can it even be the body of believers if only one part of the body shows up?
- As White Christian nationalism rises, should it be considered Christian? Why or why not? More broadly, has U.S. policies concerning race manifested within the church. If so, how? What should the church’s message be to the congregation, to the community, concerning the racism prevalent within society.
- How do Black and Latine churches differ from white churches in their liturgies, theologies, and forms of fellowship? If all are Christian, why do these differences exist? To what extent is Christianity shaped by the culture?
The part is due on Saturday, October 24.
Part Two:
Respond to the contributions of at least two other class members. Your responses to others may include acknowledgment of helpful insights gained by a fellow student's entry, further questions raised by another's comments, or a respectful critique of another's argument. Each of these response posts should be at least 150 words in length but no more than 350 words.
This part is due on Sunday, October 25.
To submit your Assignment, please complete both steps below. You must do both for each assignment to receive credit. The content of your reflection should be the same for both steps:
1. Click “Share in Forum” and post your reflection.
2. Click “Upload Assignment” and submit the same reflection as a Doc or PDF file.
Discussion (7)
[I apologize for my response being so long this week.]
DSF SEJ Wk 3
Erin Aylor
10-23-26
1. This is a question that does not have a singular answer. There are many contributing and influencing factors, and those vary widely and in weightiness depending on the region of the United States from which that a person is sharing a perspective. Perspectives may) also vary depending upon the ethnicity of the person responding. A 2021 Pew Research study (https://www.foxnews.com/faith-values/survey-black-americans-attend-church-and-pray-more-often) of 8660 Black Americans found that 60% of those who attend worship services do so in a congregation that has a Black Senior Minister and most or all of the congregation is Black. Another 25% are part of multi-racial congregations while 12% are part of a congregation that is predominantly White or another ethnicity. “Among the respondents, 77% said predominantly Black churches had played a role in helping Black people move toward racial equality. Yet just one third said historically Black congregations should preserve their traditional character; 61% said these congregations should become more racially diverse. The survey indicates that congregants at Black Protestant churches are more likely to hear preaching about race relations and criminal justice reform than those attending multiracial or white churches.”
Ryan Burge is a Professor of Practice at the Danforth Center on Religion and Politics at Washington University in St. Louis, MO (https://www.graphsaboutreligion.com/about). He is one of my favorites to follow on Facebook as he has so many different ways to slice and dice and view the overall culture of the Church across the United States. I encourage the reader to look at his work. For many of his analysis, depending on the available data set, he always includes Black Protestant as per respondents’ definition.
In regards to Hispanic churches in America, Christianity Today had an encouraging article, which suggests that these congregations may be less multicultural in regards to Hispanic and Latino vs Black vs White due to services often being in Spanish. However, they are quite multicultural in regards to the familial country of heritage (https://www.christianitytoday.com/2024/10/latino-churches-vibrant-testimony/). “First, while many American churches are suffering from an inability to reach younger generations, Latino churches are swimming against that tide. Aaron Earls of Lifeway Research has described Hispanic congregations as “newer, younger, and more effectively evangelistic than the average US Protestant church,” and he notes that “a majority conduct their services only in Spanish (53%), while 22 percent are bilingual.” And, although I don’t have space here to share more, I wanted to share a new resource I found that others might be interested in, which is the national study of youth and religion (https://youthandreligion.nd.edu/research-findings/reports/).
From my own limited experience, churches in our area often have “parallel” services in English and Spanish either at the same time or one before the other vs having a bilingual service. I know of two Baptist churches in our area that do this. We also have 4-5 other Spanish-speaking churches that host no English speaking services. Our three closest Catholic churches (Russellville, Dardanelle, and Danville) also host “parallel” services. When I was in the Nazarene denomination and shadowing a Hispanic pastor leading a Spanish service in Northwest Arkansas (NWA), their congregation was right next door to the English-speaking service. How they bridged the gap for those who wanted to attended but knew no Spanish was to wear a headset, and a person at the back was translating the whole service real-time while I was watching and listening. Once my brain got in the groove of that, it was no issue at all! Pastor Amanda shared that being able to offer that service allows for husband and wives where one may speak and understand Spanish better to worship together in the same place, getting the same level of understanding from the message, and they’ve had a lot of positive feedback! Both feel right at home. It doesn’t slow the service down and/or make it longer that way vs having consecutive interpretation, which does. People like familiarity. You see it in the roughest of places like prison where inmates usually stay like with like to the poshest of places such as universities where there are Black student societies and Asian Culture Clubs (like I’m a sponsor of at the local high school where I work). People have an affinity for those who can relate in some way to their uniqueness. My thoughts are to support those opportunities while also supporting opportunities to weave cultures together, whether in the church community or community outside the church. Change just for change’s sake is not necessarily progress. My question would be, “Is everyone welcome at XYZ church? If not, why?” As long as folks are welcome, I think that is good! All churches cannot be all things to all people, but almost all churches could be more things to more people. Has it even crossed the radar to consider supporting multiculturalism? To consider an informal self-audit of one’s congregation to see where they stand. One last thought: In our most recent DSF course, we saw a video of a multicultural church service where 2-3 different languages were on the screen and songs were sung in multiple languages but everyone always had their words to read and sing. BEAUTIFUL! It makes me think of what heaven will be like.
The differences in worship styles, choices of hymns, use of instruments and bands, times of worship, types of service, even having church Mothers in many Black churches are some differences I know of. Not all Black churches come from a Liberationist Theology point of view, but many do, and that is a different frame of reference than other churches, especially those in the more conservative denominations. My son, who is a music major at USM, would sometimes visit New Prospect Baptist Church in Russellville which is an all-Black congregation because he loved the worship style there. There are several Hispanic churches in our area where women wear lace head scarves before entering and congregants often have a big lunch for sale cooking out on the corner for after the service. These differences exist due to past culture and experiences brought into practice. Anyone can stop and buy a plate. What I love about Disciples of Christ is the spirit of ecumenism across all churches who are willing to receive it. Our church supports and loves other congregations in the area. How can all of our congregations work together in order to bless those we can reach with the Gospel of Jesus Christ? I have wondered on more than one occasion if there is a strong and growing little congregation somewhere in our area that I am missing that might need a place to worship. Could our church not allow them to use our facilities in order to grow?
I would love to be part of a vibrant, faithful multi-racial congregation. I would certainly benefit from a wider variety of voices contributing to my understanding of God and helping me see things in new ways. Rich textures of art and music and language would absolutely reflect a church truer to the gospel’s intentions for all people to come together in love and service and worship.
It seems there are some good examples of churches like these that really serve people across races, ethnicities and cultural backgrounds well. I imagine it would be really difficult, though, and require an enormous amount of work. I’m not concerned about the effort it would take to weave music and language and experience together. Sure, that would take time and intention, but that would probably be the fun part.
I would be more concerned about the immense amount of work people from the dominant culture (white people) would need to do to face their own racism and subconscious biases in order to treat everyone well. Being in congregational life together requires deep humility and graciousness. People need to feel safe and respected in order to open up in vulnerability - yet this is how transformation happens.
I imagine a major reason congregations still feel so segregated is that it’s hard for people who are used to predominantly white spaces to give up their own comforts, assumptions, and practices in order to make space for something different. Is this too pessimistic of me? Maybe. But I hate to think of someone who is marginalized in the world entering what ought to be a sanctuary and facing the pain of micro-agressions (or worse) by people who haven’t done the work to know better. I have heard from more than one person who has experienced a painful encounter like that and either returned to their segregated but more comfortable church of origin.
Which leads to answering part of the third question - that Black and Latine churches offer safe spaces for people in similar circumstances to communicate about common experiences they face in the world. Liturgy and song may focus more often on liberation or other themes that tend to the pain of discrimination or dehumanization. But also, sharing worship in a common language is powerful. Being able to testify or read scripture in the first language you learned or hearing sermons that reference your cultural icons and ancestral stories is powerful. There are also other differences based on how Christianity evolved through different locations and situations.
Just as Oshun described the changes in Santeria traditions from Africa to Cuba to Miami to Washington Heights as being necessary to fit the lives of practitioners. “All religious faiths,” she maintained, “are destined to change with each new generation to meet the people’s needs as they live in different eras under unforeseen circumstances.” I think the same can be said about Christianity - it’s been destined to become changed in thousands of ways around the world in order to serve the people who are practicing.
I do think it’s important for all of us to see one another and learn from one another across those changes. Christianity is big enough and the gospel is durable enough to expand to include people of any language or cultural background. And, people who take their Christianity seriously ought to be willing to do the work to uproot ways the culture has influenced it to uphold racist systems or practices. As long as the commitment to follow in the way of Christ is at the center, we ought to be able to come together and share communion and strengthen our faith through one another’s perspectives.
Except, of course, for Christian Nationalism! That may be too blunt, but if an ideology is truer to the tenets of a hierarchical political schema than it is to the values of loving God and neighbor and living in the ways of Christ that include compassion, servanthood, and caring for those who need it most - it does not seem like Christianity.
When I introduce the topic of Race in my Sociology class, I write White, Black, Brown, Yellow, Red across the board and ask my students to identify themself by picking one word from the list. This stratification by race is ingrained in our society and impacts everything!
We, as Christians, claim to be one body, yet we separate ourselves along the lines of culture, race and ethnicity when it comes to worship. For centuries, Whites have maintained the societal power structure by enacting laws, instilling fear and using violence. Legally, people of color were not allowed in white spaces. It is no wonder that Sunday mornings are segregated.
“Appropriate” Christian behavior has been lorded over others with strict service orders, time management, and A-A-B-A structured hymns…for centuries. This leaves no room for cultural differences in terms of language, music, dress, emotions, and other values/ethos important to different groups. White congregations have a lot of work to do to bring the whole body together as society still functions in the system created centuries ago.
“Christian Nationalism”, to me, is an oxymoron. This is a political movement, not a religious one. It implies that the United States was founded on Christian values and those values (White) should still be foundational. If for some reason a person does not fit into that “ideal”, they are anti-American and should not live here. However, Jesus’s teachings are no where to be found in this ideology.
By day 2 of my class, I have drawn a thick line separating White from the other colors. Every quarter, a white student asks me to erase the colors from the board claiming that “It doesn’t matter”… I refuse, because … it does.
My understanding of the differences in race in church has been an ongoing education since COVID. Before that time, I don’t think I was aware of so much of it. I’m still learning as I go. I grew up in white neighborhoods, white schools, white Catholic churches. It was privilege on top of privilege and all that I really knew. I’m not sure that I was ever given the opportunity to experience worship in any other way until I was an adult and had to seek out my own worship services. I continued to live in those same types of communities and those were the churches that I tried and went to over the years.
I’ll never forget saying the words in a worship council meeting during COVID times, “We are a very white church,” and the dismay that I was met with by my pastor. He vehemently disagreed and pointed out all the people that he was able to see from the pulpit when we were in church, even using my own family as an example as at the time I was married to a man who was Mexican-Japanese-Portuguese and my kids have all of that mixed in with my extreme whiteness. I could see his point, but something in it didn’t seem correct with what he was saying. There were people in the pews that weren’t white, but was our church actually not ALL white? I don’t think so. While our message is for everyone, it is one of privilege and that is something that we need to own.
My work with DSF and HELM give me an opportunity to worship in places and spaces and people that I normally wouldn’t. This is a gift beyond measure to me. This past year, I have found myself in places like National Convocation where I was able to worship with our Black church. The energy, the music, the PRAISE that comes from those spaces is so unlike how I was raised. I am always so amazed at how people in the Black church just go all in with their bodies in worship. We don’t typically do that in white church. We are very reserved and sometimes, can be robotic in comparison. It made me wonder why that was. Quite, honestly, I find myself envious of this.
Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., is not wrong that our Sundays are segregated, even in shared sanctuaries. I believe that’s because marginalized people come to their faith in a way that is different than traditional white people of privilege. As a white person, my physical existence isn’t at stake without faith, but people of other races don’t have that same experience. They have to rely on their faith for every day safety and care. I don’t want to discount our need as white people to have faith in our lives, we just don’t come to it with the same context and we most likely weren’t raised by people who needed it in the same way that we did or do.
I’m not sure how we can worship in equal spaces because of the inequality in our world. People gather with others who are going through and understand their plight in life. I need the message that forces me to put myself in someone else’s shoes, that makes me want to think from an other-centered perspective. Going to other churches where people don’t look like me is imperative to my spiritual life. I am fed there in ways that I can’t be in my home church. BUT, I can take it back with me. Right now, that’s the best that I can do.
I think diversity in congregations interestingly is increasing in non-denominational contexts, but few others. Non-denominational movements have made big inroads many non-White communities, in part by adopting a lot of prosperity gospel and self-help messaging, but regardless many play down racial or cultural differences too. I say this because I grew up in an AG / loosely non-denominational church in Fort Worth, TX. My family was one of very few Mexican-American ones, or non-White ones among the whole. We didn’t (I think) join to help diversify the congregation or bring about unity, I think it was more so the appeal of big music, a staffed childcare, and conservative cultural values. Why did my parents’ (and now I, in a PCUSA church) choose to worship in largely White congregation? And even send me to that church's private school too? And not seek one more peopled with members who looked like me?
Class concerns, and class ambitions, likely affected family's decisions (at least subconsciously). But for most, the people you're interested to worship with are those with whom you don't have to be confronted with social differences or prejudice. Until racism is squashed in other areas of people's lives, they won't soon want to tackle it in the comfort of their pew too. This comfort-seeking is understandable but not what Jesus would do. Even if he had to overcome his prejudices continually, so too should we not feel drawn to build community on pre-existing familiarity alone.
I love ecumenism, often because it means seeing and knowing other practices and heritage. Immigrant congregations who have welcomed me to worship with them have helped dissolve the stylistic boundaries and snobbery I've retained over time. But moreover, in my hearing sermons I may not fully understand but enjoy lunch that I heartily enjoy, I feel new in Christ again as I feel I should. It forces me to wonder how I can remain connected and what part in a broader community I might play. How can I help in the projects I'm not the arbiter of? What new questions can I ask or answer?
The church is still segregated because our neighborhoods, schools, businesses, and wealth are still segregated. Without actively dismantling those institutions that preserve segregation (like the church itself perhaps), we cannot expect to worship God in less segregated ways than we do now.
To #2:
The church, in faith of God's corporate love and total devotion to every child, ought to talk often and frankly about how our society oppresses and exploits marginalized folk. That requires indicting racism and diagnosing its role in the material conditions that harm people of color’s health, opportunity, dignity, agency, and share of authority in our society. We ought to serve (and our congregation should see and speak too) as a moral voice with civic institutions like the police, school districts, local governments and legislatures, to think historically and act presently to raise the floor of acceptable outcomes to just that of the Black, Latine, and other non-White communities that have been targeted for generations.
The church should do more than advocate personal non-racist behavior, or worse color-blindness, it should empower individuals to participate in a corporate effort of anti-racism that it should help shepherd. U.S. policies regarding “helping (only) those who help themselves”, putting one's own country/race first, respecting/authorizing state power, and supporting a head of household's authority to protect themselves against threats to their way of life or sense of security, all have deeply infected the teachings and work of the church. Preaching for preserving tradition, a way of life, or one's own heritage, is often wedded to calls for expanding and retaining the sovereignty of God over destabilizing change agents and corrupted institutions that may impose woke ideals. Even without mentioning race explicitly, these calls to allow fear of change - in the racial composition of UT football fans, in the number of languages in education or public services, etc. - to be set within a context of adherence to God and his appointment of the USA as His chosen nation state, is a de facto justification for racist animus and action.
White Christian Nationalism is 100% Christian, even if it is not all that (or is even consistent with much else of all else that) Christianity has produced. I'd say it's sufficiently, but not necessarily, Christian - Christianity was enough to have launched its work, but it also launched far more besides which more compellingly invalidates much of what it purports. Unfortunately, Christianity has long advocated for White supremacy and domination as well as nationalistic and colonialist projects for centuries. So, this latest iteration is not easily called an aberration. It is not however much to do with what Jesus it turns out teaches, nor what the will of God I believe sets out. The Bible is rife with nationalist fervor throughout it's account of the plight of the Hebrews. And it's language on slavery, treatment of women, and even of other races or faiths, has long been used as justification for exclusion, domination, and murder.
But more to the point, it doesn’t have to be Christian any longer if we call it out and throw out it's claim to Christ. Christianity has the capacity still to do good, serve God, and organize believers into more closely forming the body of Christ. It's not over yet. Some may advocate to start over, after all Luther made a good go at it. Regardless of the outcome, White Christian Nationalism does not serve the will of God because it does not enable relationships among all God's children and legitimizes harming God's people under the aegis of White domination, and thus is anti-Christ and just plain malignant.
To #3:
What I know about Black churches comes largely from attending a few services and Bible studies with a nearby predominantly Black Baptist church my Presbyterian church partners with, learning about their role in organizing for civil rights throughout US history, and from reading Cole Arthur Riley's book Black Liturgies which had begun online as posts on Instagram during COVID knockdown. To my brief understanding, services were often longer and important social affairs at which it's important to be seen, many with extended & enthusiastic communal worship sessions set off by a live rhythm section. Theologically, I believe there's a long tradition of glorifying the redemptive power of Christ, resilience & the end of suffering, and the freedom God instills in each and every child. I also heard this interesting report this week of how general engagement with and the theological traditions of the Black church are changing significantly with other cultural changes of the last few decades:
https://youtu.be/DguBCfCgYM4?si=bFjghw_Yqbta6-Q0
My understanding of Latine church is from my time spent with my grandparents - one set Catholic, the other Pentecostal. Both were places reinforcing tradition, care for the poor, were meant to serve as one's community of association, and centered authority within male pastors who “led” their congregations. Both also had their congregational life largely cooked for and organized by its women. Liturgy between these two diverged: between formal ritual and charismatic preaching, deference to icons/symbols and altar calls, hymnody and DIY guitars & keyboards, etc. I attended my Pentecostal family's church more often and heard vivid depictions of God's power and might, the sins and faults of the world, the transformative power of the Espíritu Sancto, and the weekly reminder I could see all things anew accepting Jesus into my heart.
Having attended a PCUSA church for 10 years now and an AG one my whole childhood, I'd say White churches are actively less conscious of their role in society and especially of their role with respect to racial equity and anti-racism. If anything, growing up in a mostly White AG church made me think I was White too by default. Only as I got older did I see my active participation in youth programs like Royal Rangers, a quasi-paramilitary offshoot of Scouting maintained by the AG, highlighted by my church and region for tokenistic reasons. In this way, my childhood church absorbed me into its Whiteness while pretending it had disappeared.
Christianity is absolutely shaped by its surrounding culture and is manifested in by whom and how its funded, and the place in society its members live in. My grandparents’ Pentecostal church was a local mission connected to no other denomination, created by passionate, pious believers. Alternatively, the Catholic one my grandparents, and many others they knew, participated in much by default as a remnant of its colonial presence in their hometown in the Rio Grande Valley. They went to Catholic schools because that's who were willing to teach Mexicans in the 50s.
Long story short, Christianity is an instrument of power sometimes and other times one of love and community too. But more often, it's doing both.